Saturday, February 21, 2015

"Not A New Doctrine" by Bertrand Comparet


 by Bertrand L. Comparet

To many of you, the idea that the Anglo-Saxon-Germanic-Scandinavian nations are the Israel of the Bible is startling, because you have not heard it until recently; and you wonder, why haven't I heard this from the beginning? But deep students of the Bible have known it a long time. During the centuries when other empires were dominant, general knowledge of the Israel identity would have been premature, for It would have aroused the jealousy and hatred of these other empires before we were strong enough to deal with them; but since we have come to national maturity, the knowledge has been available to those who cared to learn the truth. There have been a number of books on this subject, such as "The Lost Ten Tribes", by Rev. Dr. Joseph Wild, published in 1883, "The Fullness of Nations" by Aldersmith, of London, published in 1889; "Lost Israel Found" by Edward Hine, published in England in the 1870s; and the many brilliant books written by Professor Totten of Yale University, published in the 1880s and 1890s. But I want to tell you of a lecture given before the United States Congress.  It  was by Rev. F. E. Pitts, of Nashville, Tennessee, in which he identified the United States as the land of re-gathered Israel, and the scene of much of the final War, the so called Battle of Armageddon, as pictured in Ezekiel 38 and 39. Since 1855, Rev. Pitts had been lecturing on this subject across the nation, resulting in this invitation to speak before Congress.
Rev. Pitts pointed out that the land of restored Israel was to be located between two seas: "the east sea" was to be its east side, while "the great sea" would be the west side. (Ezekiel 47:18-20) This could not be Palestine, because there Is no sea marking Its east border: but not only do we have seas on East and West, but the Great Sea is on the west. Also, Israel would be in a land "which has been always waste" (unused, uncultivated) --- never true of Palestine, but true of our land until we settled and began to cultivate it. (Ezekiel 38:8).
The land of Israel to be attacked by Russia was to be inhabited by a population "gathered out of many people" and "brought forth out of the nations" (Ezekiel 38:8) Isaiah says I will bring thy seed from the east, and gather thee from the west; I will say to the north, Give up; and to the south, Keep not back: and bring My sons from far and My daughters from the ends of the earth." (Isaiah 43:5-6) Also, Immigrants of non Israel people would furnish our labor forces: "Strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your plowmen and our vinedressers * * the sons of strangers shall build up thy walls." Isaiah 61:5 60:10) These Immigrants would be allowed to own and Inherit land (Ezekiel 22-23) This is a picture of the United States, but never of Palestine.
It was to be "a land of unwalled villages them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates." (Ezekiel 38:11) The prophet Ezekiel had never seen a city without walls and a barred gate; but our cities here have never had walls or gates. (And today, most of the Jewish towns have belts of barbed wire and explosive mines around them).
This land of Israel in the last days was to be one which had great­ly expanded in size. The 49th. chapter of Isaiah tells us: "Lift up thine eyes round about, and behold: all these gather themselves together and come to thee. * * For thy waste and thy desolate places, and the land of thy destruction, shall even now be too narrow by reason of the Inhabi­tants; and they that swallowed thee up shall be far away. The children which thou shalt have, after thou last lost the other, shall say again in thine ears, The place is too narrow for me: give place to me that I may dwell."   That is, we were outgrowing the old, Palestinian land, even in Isaiah's day; but in the day to which he looked forward, we should be in another land, and "they that swallowed us up shall be far away"---that is, we would be far away from the Assyrian Empire which swallowed us up In Isaiah's day. But after we had lost our old land, the children we should have after that should say of the new land, "It Is too narrow for us: give us more room, as a place to dwell."  In Rev. Pitts' time, we had already expanded from our original 13 colonies: we had added Texas and the great Mississippi Valley area of the Louisiana Purchase, we had annexed the great southwest area from Mexico, we had gained California and the Pacific Coast. Nothing like this could be said of Palestine- --either in 1857 or now.
Again, Rev. Pitts saw that the Bible said we would be in a land remarkable for the number of its majestic rivers: "There the glorious Lord will be unto us a place of broad rivers and streams, wherein shall be no galley with oars: (Isaiah 33:21) Even the Jordan is but a tiny river; and nothing else In Palestine Is more than a rivulet; but here, there are thousands of miles of great, majestic rivers. And the Hebrew word translated "Galley" actually means a government revenue clipper, sent out by a superior kingdom to collect tariffs and taxes from a tributary people: there would be none of these here. In fact, our Boston Tea Party made sure of that.
Again, our home in these days would be occupied by a peaceful people, and all of one language. Rev. Pitts quotes Isaiah 33:19---"Thou shalt not see a fierce people, a people of a deeper speech than thou canst perceive; of a stammering tongue that thou canst not understand." Even though we received great numbers of immigrants from Germany, Italy, France, as well as Scandinavia and the British Empire, one language prevailed over all the country.
Also, the Bible prophesied that in our beginning, we should be a nation of 13 colonies. Ezekiel 47:13 says that " * * Ye shall inherit the land according to the twelve Tribes of Israel: Joseph shall have TWO PORTIONS." Starting with 12 Tribes, but giving one of them 2 portions, makes 13 portions Into which the land would be divided.
Likewise, Rev. Pitts noted that the Bible pointed out that, in these latter days, we, the people of Israel, would be a Republic. We will choose for ourselves a President, for Hosea 1:11 says: "Then shall the Children of Judah and the Children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint themselves one head." . We should not be like the monarchies of Europe, where the hereditary noble class intermarried, and by marriage Princes, Dukes and Barons could govern other lands than their own: Here, only from among our own people could, the Governors, Senators and Congress­men be chosen. Jeremiah 30:21 points out: "Their nobles shall be of themselves, and their Governor shall proceed from the midst of them" And Isaiah 1:26 says, "I will restore thy Judges as at the first, and thy counselors as at the beginning." When Israel was governed by her Judges, she had no King but God; so God promised to restore this condition---and we find this to be true.
So, If you have thought that the recognition of the Anglo-Saxon nations, and especially the United States, as being God s People Israel, is just some sudden, new Idea, you are mistaken. The proof has been there in the Bible, all the time. Of course, even 200 years ago it would have been very hard to see, for we had not yet grown into the condition the prophets described. But, as you see, good Bible students could see this truth over a century ago, and once again prove that God's word is always true.

"God's Immigration Laws" by Bertrand Comparet


 by Bertrand L. Comparet

Of these, only the ORDINANCES have been set aside by the New Testament. The rituals and symbols embodied in them were the expression of the Israelite's belief that his Redeemer would come, in the future; but when Jesus Christ had come and performed the reality which these rituals symbolized, their usefulness was ended.   The believer could no longer say that he was waiting for the future coming of his Redeemer---they must be replaced by new rituals looking back to the fulfilled Redemption. 
But the other Laws of God are still in force: THOU SHALT NOT STEAL and THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY are as important today as when Moses carried the stone tablets down Mount Sinai. We do not expect to gain our personal salvation by keeping the law; and indeed, this was never their true purpose. But we do expect to gain the peace, prosperity and good order of the community thereby, just as we have tried to do this by enforcing the laws of our City, our State, and our Nation. 
Let no one be misled Into thinking that God's COMMANDMENTS, JUDGMENTS and STATUTES have been set aside by the New Testament. These are permanent laws. In Matthew 5:48, Jesus Christ tells us that God is perfect; naturally, so are His laws. Psalm 19 tells us: "The Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul; the STATUTES of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart; the COMMANDMENT of the Lord Is pure, enlightening the eyes. * * The JUDGMENTS of the Lord are true and righteous altogether." 
Do you say, "But Christianity is all spiritual, so we have abolished the law? Not so! In Romans 7:14, Paul tells us that THE LAW IS SPIRITUAL; and In Romans 3:31, he says: "Do we then make void the Law through faith? God forbid: yea, WE ESTABLISH THE LAW. Just as our perfect God exists forever, so do His perfect laws, for Psalm 111:7-8 tells us: "The work of His hands are verity and JUDGMENT; all His COMMANDMENTS  are sure. THEY STAND FAST FOR EVER AND EVER, and are done in truth and uprightness." And Jesus Christ, Himself, says, In Matthew 5:18 that not the tiniest part of the Law will pass away, until heaven and earth pass away (and this, as we see in Rev. 21, is not until after the Millenium, JESUS CHRIST'S triumphant 1,000 year reign). 
Let us now consider some of these laws, and what they mean to us, today. Our political parties have sold our God in an evil deal to get the support of Minority Groups; for the sake of temporary power and graft, they would destroy all our greatness -forever. 
They demand that we admit, indiscriminately, all the world's overflow, from pagan lands who hate our god, from Asian and African lands whose people are totally impossible to assimilate, and who must either remain a hostile enemy bloc within our borders, or else mongrelize and destroy our own race if we mix with them. But God expressly forbids this. 'While it is recognized that there will be some aliens here as students, merchants, etc., and these are to be treated with honesty and justice, the anti-Christians, who hate our God, are expressly forbidden to be allowed to live here: God says, "They shall not dwell In thy land, lest they make thee sin against Me." (Exodus 2:33). 
No aliens were to be allowed to become numerous, lest they "devour the land" (Isaiah 1 :7) or "the people's strength" (Hosea 7:9), and fill themselves with the people's wealth (Proverbs 5:10). Ecclesiastics 11:34 warns us that, if we "Receive a stranger into thy house, he will disturb thee, and turn thee out of thine own." 
Have you ever wondered at the long genealogies of the various people mentioned in the Bible? There was a good reason for this: their genealogy. It  proved that they were of true Israel blood, and entitled to take part in Its affairs. Citizenship was not given for two box tops and a dime, to all who came along. Those who were of related blood lines, but not actually of Israel, could only be admitted to citizenship In the third generation born in the land. Today, an immigrant scarcely need be off the boat long enough to get over his seasickness before he can start the process of becom­ing a citizen. Par too short a time is required for aliens from some parts of the world to really learn our way of life: they can, and do, memorize certain things they must be able to recite on their examination for citizen­ship---but these things pertain to the mechanics of our government, not the ideals which led the Pounding Fathers to use those mechanics to make us great. Under God's laws, those who were not closely related to us in race could not be admitted to citizenship, ever, not even after ten generations. (Deuteronomy 23).
By violating God's laws, we now have considerable blocs of unassimilable aliens who have been given the vote. They hate all the ideals of this land to which they came only to get more money. And now our political parties are selling out the great American Majority in bidding for the support of the alien Minority Groups.
Under God's laws, no-one of another race is allowed to hold public office. Deuteronomy 17:19 says that "Thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, one which Is not thy brother." The word translated stranger" is the Hebrew word "NOMRI" which means not just someone you haven't met, but ONE OF ANOTHER RACE. That persons of other races could reach positions of pow­er is clearly stated to be only a curse which comes upon us for our viola­tions of Divine Law; Deuteronomy 28 says: "But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes which I command thee this day, THAT ALL THESE CURSES SHALL COME UPON THEE, AND OVERTAKE THEE: The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high, and thou shalt come down very low. He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him; he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail. * * because thou hearkenedst not unto the voice of the Lord that God, to keep His commandments and His statutes which He commanded thee.We have been persistently led away from the Laws of God by certain political groups who don't even claim to represent the majority of our peo­ple, the White Christian Americans, but who openly represent only alliances of Minority Groups. These politicians call themselves "Liberal." This, also, was known to God thousands of years before it happened; and He also told us their true character. In the 32nd. chapter of Isaiah, the prophet is telling us of that time yet to come when the Kingdom of God will be fully established and operating as it should be; and he tells us that then if The vile person shall no more be called liberal." God speed the day! 
For nearly sixty years, politicians have betrayed us, the great maj­ority, seeking the support of certain disloyal Minorities. The result has been the adoption of policies, both at home and abroad, which have brought Us to our present position, facing a war in which we must fight for our very existence. If we had obeyed God in the making of our laws and our national policies, these evils would not have come upon us. Isaiah 48 tells us: 
Thus saith the Lord, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel: I am the Lord thy God, which teacheth thee to profit, which leadeth thee by the way that thou shouldest go, 0 that thou hadst hearkened to My commandments! Then-had thy peace been as a river, and thy righteousness as the waves of the sea," (But) "There is no peace, saith the Lord, unto the wicked," What wickedness? Ours, in letting evil and treacherous political considerations displace the Laws of God, replacing them with platforms written to see who can stoop to the lowest baseness to buy Minority votes. 
When will we learn that only by following the righteous Laws of God can gain the peace and prosperity of God's People.


"Christianity Discriminates" by Bertrand Comparet




Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet

Part of the campaign of brainwashing to which the American public is being subjected is a huge and well financed effort to make us believe that all discrimination is bad. Those of us whose memory reaches back 40 years or more, will recall that the ability to discriminate between things of different value or utility, was then recognized as a most essential part of intelligence.  Those too dull to see differences where they exist were considered stupid.  How does it happen that the subsidized press, radio and television commentators now so bitterly denounce all who can discriminate?  They even try to make us believe that discrimination is not Christian!  Since all of the devil's doctrines are now being preached under the false pretense of "Christianity", let us examine the only source from which we can determine God's position on the subject of discrimination.
From beginning to end, the Bible is a book of discrimination, discrimination by God Himself and discrimination which God commanded us to make.  We find the first record of God's discrimination in Genesis 4:3-5, where we read, "And in process of time it came to pass that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord.  And Abel also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof.  And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering: but unto Cain and to his offering He had not respect".  What is this?
But that is only the beginning.  In Genesis 5:3-4, it describes Adam's family, yet it mentions by name only one of his children Seth, and barely notices the existence of the others.  Discrimination?  Yes, indeed!  Right on down through verse 31, this chapter notes the existence of each succeeding generation, yet approves only one in each generation by giving his name.
This brings us to Noah.  In Genesis 6:17-18, we find that God discriminated in favor of Noah and his family and against all the other people living in that land.  God saw a difference between them?  Of course he saw a difference.  But today we are told that we must pretend that there is no difference between the races even when we clearly know that this pretense is false.
Follow me on down through Genesis and we find that God discriminated in favor of one and against others in every generation down to Abraham.  Among Abraham's children, God discriminated in favor of Isaac and against Ishmael.  Among Isaac's children, God again favored Jacob over Esau, making Jacob the father of God's people and changing his name to Israel, while Esau and his descendants were cursed with God's indignation forever.  Likewise, God favored Joseph over all his eleven brothers and again God discriminated in favor of the Israelites and against the Egyptians.  "How awful! say our modern liberals.  Why, that is racism!"  Yes, frankly, it is and it is God's own choice at that.  God has certainly lost the "Minority Group" vote but I am grateful to Him for setting an example which we can follow.
Some people have been misled by their churches into the belief that the Old Testament is only a record of God's mistakes and failures.  That God had to abandon all this and make a new start in the New Testament, which changed everything.  No greater falsehood was ever taught.  God was right the first time and all the time.
The Old Testament and the New Testament are perfectly consistent.  There is as much Christianity in the Old Testament as there is in the New Testament.  The New Testament is as much an Israel book as was the Old Testament.
No doubt many of you have heard many preachers say that discrimination is not Christian.  Let's look into this.  Who is the supreme authority on what is Christian?
It cannot be anyone except Jesus Christ Himself.  No one can tell me that Jesus Christ was unChristian.
Fortunately, Jesus Christ never used any of the weasel worded evasions which are considered polite today.  He always fearlessly spoke the exact truth, in words too plain to be mistaken.  All the Gospels record that, among the Jews, Jesus Christ spoke His teachings in parables which they could not understand.  Later, He explained these parables to His disciples in private.  At least three of the Gospels record that Jesus explained to His disciples why He took such pains to keep the Jews from understanding Him.  In Mark 4:11-21, we read, "And He said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing, they may see and not perceive; and hearing, they may hear and not understand: Lest at any time they should be converted and their sins should be forgiven them".  Now that is real discrimination!  How could you make it any stronger?
But that is not all.  Both Matthew 15:22-28 and Mark 7:25-30, record that, when a Canaanite woman asked Jesus Christ to drive the demon out of her daughter, He replied that it was not proper to take the children's bread and cast it to the dogs.  Not until she acknowledged that the children of God, the true Israelites, must first receive His gifts, and through them the Kingdom of God would be brought to the other races. Not until then did He consent to heal her daughter.
Discrimination?  Yes, indeed!  Racism?  Certainly!   But who dares to call Jesus Christ unChristian?  Yes, I think that some of the "liberal" and "Modernist" preachers will actually say this!  But this only shows clearly how much Satanism is falsely masquerading as Christianity today.
But this discrimination becomes even stronger.  In Matthew 7:6, Jesus Christ warns all His followers, "Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn again and rend you."  Certainly everyone knows that Jesus Christ was not so foolish as to think that His disciples were going into the barnyard and start preaching to the four legged animals there.  When He spoke of "dogs" and "swine" He was speaking of the two legged varieties.  DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN RACES?  CERTAINLY!!!  But we haven't had sense enough to believe Him and obey Him.  We have given that which is holy, our Christian religion, unto the dogs in Africa and Asia.
Today, those missionaries who did not escape in time have been eaten in Africa or are slowly dying in Red Chinese prisons.  The precious pearls which God gave to us, the inventive skill He placed in our minds, the high civilization which enables us to produce great abundance of every useful produce, these we have cast before the swine of the earth.  They now trample under their feet the peaceful prosperity we tried to give them and use our science, our machines, even the surplus food we ship them, as weapons with which to destroy us.
Yes, I know how the minority groups and the mongrelizers are raging against what I am saying.  But it is time that God's truth be told before it is too late.  Jesus Christ warned us to discriminate between races, just as He discriminated.  In His last talk with His disciples, in John 14-17, Jesus Christ said that He would send to them the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, whom the nations of the world order (cosmos) cannot receive because they do not see Him nor know Him.  Jesus said that He prayed only for those who were His and not for the world system.
Jesus Christ knew the folly and falsehood of pretending that all people, all races, are alike or equal.  He knew that every sacrifice of truth on the polluted altar of expediency and politics brings its terrible penalty in national and racial degradation which only their destruction has ever succeeded in cleansing.
All history is a vast junkyard of the wreckage of empires which ignored this lesson and in consequence thereof, perished.  Several times in our past history, we were on this path to destruction and were only saved by the direct intervention of God.  Today, we have allowed corrupt leaders to take us so far into this shadow of death that again, only the promised intervention of God can now save us.  We have His promise to save us if we will get down on our knees and beg for forgiveness and then He will heal our land.  If we will do our part God will keep His promises to Israel.  While yet we can, let us turn back to the word of our God.  Discriminate between that which is good for us and that which is deadly.  That which is our own and that which is alien to ourselves and to our God.

"Can Anything Be Judeo-Christian?" by Bertrand Comparet




Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet


This is an age when news has been superseded by propaganda and education by brainwashing and indoctrination. From the advertising used to sell shoddy goods, to the classes in your schools designed to make your children into obedient robots of a socialist state. The art of persuasion has displaced the simple virtue of truth. The masters who rule out of the shadows, using as puppets those who govern us, to drive this nation ever farther down the path to socialism.

They seek to gain control of your mind, for with that, they will rule you in all things. One of the great fortresses of the mind, which they must capture if they are to change your destiny, is your religion.
Suddenly we have been bombarded from all sides with references to "our Judeo-Christian religion" and "our Judeo-Christian heritage". Just as the other Communist party line phrases, "war monger", "hate monger" and "extreme right wing", have appeared suddenly in all our newspapers and most of our magazines. When the Communist party decreed it, so likewise has the similarly inspired phrase "Judeo-Christian" appeared suddenly in the writings of hosts of men who seek to mold public opinion. Were this the spontaneous idea of some one writer who originated it, he would have a monopoly on it for some time. Instead it has been used simultaneously by the many who serve the Party, until even the fumbling copyists join in the chorus, not knowing whose purpose they are serving.
Is there any truth in this phrase, "Judeo-Christian"? Is Christianity derived from Judaism? Does Christianity have anything in common with Judaism? Who can say with authority what the answer may be? Certainly Jesus Christ is the great authority on this subject, for none knows better than He and next would come His disciples. Let us ask them whether Christianity can be truthfully called "Judeo Christian".
The foundation and highest authority of Judaism is the Talmud. In the time of Jesus Christ, this bore the name of "The Tradition of the Elders". At that time there were two principal religious sects, the Sadducees and the Pharisees. The Sadducees were gross materialists who did not believe in a resurrection of the dead, or in any other form of immortality. They recognized the written Law, as given by Moses in the Pentateuch, but it was "Lip service" rather than honest obedience. In the time of Christ, they controlled the priesthood and the High Priest was always chosen from their ranks.
The Pharisees, on the other hand, recognized the existence of angels and spirits, both good and bad and believed in resurrection of the dead. While they recognized the written Law, as given in the Scriptures, they also claimed that there was a great body of oral tradition which was of at least equal authority with the written Law. Many claimed that the Tradition was of greater authority. By their tradition, they undertook to explain and elaborate upon the Law. This was the Tradition of the Elders, to which the name of "Talmud" was later given. It had its beginning at Babylon, during the Babylonian captivity of the nation of Judah, where it developed in the form of the commentaries of various rabbis, undertaking to explain and apply the Law.
This traditional, or Talmudic Judaism, was very different from the true religion, the true religion which we find in the Old Testament. The late Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, who was the chief Rabbi of the United States, expressed this so clearly that I cannot improve upon his words. Rabbi Wise said, "The return from Babylon and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud, marks the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of Judaism." Since the true religion of the Old Testament was the religion of the real Hebrews (NOT JEWS), the learned Rabbi was quite right in calling it "Hebrewism" and noting that it was abandoned when the Talmud, or "Tradition of the Elders" was adopted. This also constitutes the beginning of Judaism.
Nothing could be clearer than the total antagonism between Judaism and Christianity. All the opposition to Jesus Christ, including their murder of Him upon the cross, came from Judaism and those who professed it as their religion. Remember that the total entirety of Judaism was represented by the Pharisees and Sadducees. Now, with this in mind, let us review the Gospels and see if there we can find anything which can truthfully be called "Judeo Christian".
The scene opens with John the Baptist at the River Jordan, baptising those who came to him in genuine repentance of their sins. We read in Matthew 3:7, "But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, "O children of vipers!, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?" John must have felt that he didn't get any of his religion from Judaism, the Talmud or the Tradition of the Elders.
But what of Jesus Christ, Himself? Did He feel that He owed any of His religion to Judaism? Let Him answer that. In Matthew 15:1-9, we read, "Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying, 'Why do thy disciples transgress the Tradition of the Elders? For they wash not their hands when they eat bread." He answered and said unto them, 'WHY DO YE ALSO TRANSGRESS THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD BY YOUR TRADITION? Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition. Ye hypocrites! Well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying 'This people draweth nigh unto Me with their mouth and honoreth Me with their lips; but their heart is far from Me. BUT IN VAIN DO THEY WORSHIP ME, TEACHING FOR DOCTRINES THE COMMANDMENTS OF MEN.'"
Do you find anything "Judeo-Christian in that? Jesus was always warning people to beware of the false religion of the Pharisees and Sadducees. For example in Mark 8:15, we read, "And He charged them saying 'Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees.'" In Matthew 5:20, He said, "For I say unto you, that unless your righteousness shall exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the Kingdom of Heaven." In Luke 11:39, it says, "And the Lord said unto him, 'Now do ye Pharisees make clean the outside of the cup and platter: but your inward part is full of ravening and wickedness,'" Was it from this source that Jesus Christ drew Christianity? Nothing "Judeo-Christian" in that!!
Turn now to Matthew 23:13-15,23,25,27 & 29, seven different times Jesus Christ begins His denunciation of them with the words, "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites!" Remember that the Pharisees represented the highest form of Judaism. Was this 'Judeo-Christian"? Without one single exception, Jesus Christ utterly rejected and condemned Judaism, in language as strong as He ever used against complete idolatry.
But what of the Pharisees and Sadducees? Did they show any attempt to become reconciled to Him and to have a part in some so called "Judeo-Christian" religion? When they heard of His miraculous healing of the sick or even saw it with their own eyes, their attitude is summed up in Matthew 12:24, "But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, 'This fellow doth not cast out devils but by Beelzebub, the prince of the devils.'" They totally rejected Him. For example in the 7th Chapter of John, where they sent officers to arrest Jesus, so they could murder Him; but the officers came back without Him. Then we read, "Then came the officers to the chief priests and Pharisees; and they said unto them, 'Why have ye not brought Him?' The officers answered, 'Never man spake like this man.' Then answered them the Pharisees, 'Are ye also deceived?'" Have any of the rulers or of the Pharisees believed on Him?
Finally, their only reaction to Him was that of hatred and murder. Matthew 12:14, Mark 3:6, and John 11:47-53, record the incident. "Then gathered the chief priests and Pharisees a council and said, 'What do we? For this man doeth many miracles! If we let Him alone, all men will believe on Him. Then from that day forth, they took counsel together for to put Him to death." In fact, as we read in John 13:10-11, they even conspired to murder poor Lazarus, whom Jesus had raised from the dead, because this miracle caused many to believe in Jesus Christ. Is THIS "Judeo-Christian"? "Judeo" it truly is, but Christian it is NOT and never was.
WAKE UP! Who is behind this great propaganda effort to brainwash you into thinking that your religion is "Judeo-Christian"? Why are they spending so much money to give it such great publicity? What do they hope to accomplish by it? It is false and sinister to the utmost extreme. Never be misled by it. Your Redeemer, Jesus Christ Himself condemned it in the strongest terms. Believe Him, not the propagandists.