Yahweh, The God of Segregation, vs. Satan, the god of Integration
By Clifton A. Emahiser
As the title suggests, we are going to address today’s greatest source of dismay causing untold strife and heartache. I was seeking a way to impress on the reader’s mind just how debauched our society has become. I also thought to describe Satan as a “demagogue”, but it is stated at 2 Cor. 4:4: “In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of Yahweh, should shine unto them.” Thus, we have two gods here; a True One and a would-be counterfeit. As the above title indicates, these two gods have two opposing agendas. And from the title, one need not be left in doubt which god one is following. By-and-large, today, churchianity is following Satan, the god of integration. Not only that, but better than 90% of the pastors in Israel Identity teach universalism, catering to the non-white races. Oh, churchianity gives lip service to a god with no name, while at the same time supporting missionary endeavors to alien enosh. Ted R. Weiland even admitted to sending some Bibles to Nigeria. Such endeavors are Satan’s agenda, not Yahweh’s!
I don’t want to leave the impression that all churchgoers are intentionally promoting Satan’s agenda of multiculturalism, but rather many are doing it ignorantly. Nevertheless, wittingly or unwittingly, the results are just as evil. I have to admit that, before I learned the truth of the Israel Message, at the solicitation of a church member whose daughter had gone to seminary and was stationed in Africa, my late wife and I bought several boxes of prepared cake mix to send there to help the mission Christianize the natives. This we came to regret for we did it in total ignorance.
When all of this happened back in the mid-1950’s, money was rather scarce, and had I the opportunity to do it all over again, my wife and I would have had several cakes on our own table! At that time, we belonged to the Bethel Evangelical Church in Fostoria, Ohio at the corner of Union and Liberty streets. About this same time, the United Brethren merged with the Evangelical and adopted the name Evangelical United Brethren. A short time later, the Evangelical United Brethren united with the Methodist, calling the affiliation the United Methodist church, dropping entirely the name Evangelical.
I don’t want to leave the impression that Satan is a god that can create something, but rather he can only corrupt that which Yahweh has already created. And the way in which Satan corrupts is through hybridization: whether crops, animals or people. Satan’s first effort with Adam-man was to seduce Eve and produce the hybrid, racially-altered Cain. Thus, Satan is the god of multiculturalism. At John 1:1-3 it is clear that there is but one creator God: “1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.”
By the way, the elohim of Genesis chapter 1 is singular in every case, not plural as most presume. And although the name of Yahweh is not used in Genesis 1, Psalm 33:6-9 places Him there saying: “6 By the word of Yahweh were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth. 7 He gathereth the waters of the sea together as an heap: he layeth up the depth in storehouses. 8 Let all the earth fear Yahweh: let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him. 9 For he spake, and it was done; he commanded, and it stood fast.” From this it would appear we are either following the One who created everything after its kind, or we are following Satan the god of racial integration.
From a new 1999 translation published by Kregel entitled The New Complete Works Of Josephus by Paul L. Maier, at Antiquities book 1, chap. 2, we read: “But Cain was not only wicked in other respects, but was wholly intent on getting; and he first contrived to plough the ground. He killed his brother on the occasion following: They had resolved to sacrifice to God. Now Cain brought the fruits of the earth, and of his husbandry; but Abel brought milk, and the firstfruit of his flocks. But God was more delighted with the latter sacrifice, when he was honored with what grew naturally of its own accord, than He was with what was the invention of a covetous man, and gotten by forcing the ground.” [emphasis mine]
If this Josephus translation is correct, Cain may have been hybridizing the plants that he grew. If such is the case, we have in Cain a hybridized person growing hybridized crops! Again, if such is true, no wonder Yahweh was displeased with BOTH Cain and his sacrifice! What could have been more wicked on Cain’s part? This could conceivably be why the bad-fig-jews of today (the lineal descendants of Cain) have an agenda to hybridize the entire White Israel race with the non-whites. If so, no wonder Jude, at verse 11, puts Cain in the same category with Balaam!
Not only is it “the way of Cain”, as Jude informs us, but it is identical to the “doctrine of Balaam”. Rev. 2:14 says: “But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.” The word “fornication” in this verse means race-mixing! So whatever the place and whatever the event, if it’s multicultural in any way, shape, or form, it’s “the way of Cain” and known in Scripture as the “doctrine of Balaam”. Balaamism is a bastard doctrine taught by bastard-minded, so-called pastors, whether in nominal churchianity or Israel Identity, for it encourages multiculturalism among the ekklesia. It was a “stumblingblock” at the time of Balak, and at Pergamos at the time John wrote Revelation, and it is still a stumbling-block to this very day! Balaamism is multiculturalism, pure and simple, and anyone who teaches it is a bastard-monger. It is usually espoused in the name of “universalism”, a doctrine which embraces all races. To include “whomsoever” with the house of Israel and the house of Judah is out-and-out fraud, and anyone doing so is a criminal worthy of death!
Yahshua Christ Himself pointed to Cain as being the ancestor of the bad-fig-jews at Matt. 23:35: “That upon you [bad-fig-jew scribes and Pharisees] may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.” Question: Who else killed Abel other than Cain? If these words by our Redeemer were not literally true, it would have made Him a false witness in a murder case, a criminal who should die according to the law in like manner as the one falsely accused. Since Christ was Yahweh the Creator in the flesh, who are we to contradict His words? Yet many do! The same people who deny this passage also deny John 8:44, where Yahshua Christ tells us that the bad-fig-jews’ ancestral father were both literally “the devil” and “a murderer from the beginning”. By denying the truth of these passages, they aid and abet Satan in his plot for racial integration, while at the same time implying that our Messiah is a liar. This would include all of the anti-two-seedliners, as well as all of the universalists! But some will say that some of the universalists have some positive things to say. Well, the serpent had some positive things mixed with lies to say to Eve, and look what happened. One can have more respect for an habitual liar than one who speaks only half-truths. And universalism, one-seedline and no-Satan doctrines mixed with the truth of Israel Identity are despicable, malignant, repugnant lies! Those who teach such half-truths follow Satan, the god of integration!
From Cain being fathered by Satan, Cain was the first half-breed in Satan’s program for racial integration. I know that some will try to quote Gen. 4:1, claiming that Cain was Adam’s son, but Gen. 4:1 has been proven to be corrupt by Hebrew scholars. Satan’s program continued up until the time of Noah and the flood when only eight could be found with a pure Adamic family-tree. Where Gen. 6:9 says of Noah in the A.V., “perfect in his generations” it would have been better rendered “perfect in his genealogy”. All one need do today is to look around and it is quite evident that Satan’s agenda of racial integration is alive and well and going full speed ahead. What it all amounts to is: we are in a war with Satan for the survival of the White Adamic race, and we are taking casualties in unprecedented numbers on every hand! It’s not like a war with explosives and flying bullets, for in Satan’s war of integration the fatalities are not evident until nine months later, when a half-breed is born, and all mamzers are born void of Spirit.
From the time of Noah’s flood until Abraham is a large period of time for which little is recorded in our Bible, outside of the table of nations and the tower of Babel. But once we arrive at the time of the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the language of Scripture is such as to indicate that Satan’s agenda in his war of integration had not ceased in its intensity. This is evident in Rebekah’s statement to Isaac at Gen. 27:46: “And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth: if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?” If Rebekah were living in today’s society, she would be charged with racism and a demand would be made for her to become politically correct and apologize to Esau’s Hittite wives and attend some sensitivity training classes.
Then Isaac concurred with Rebekah at Gen. 28: 1-2: “1 And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan. 2 Arise, go to Padanaram, to the house of Bethuel thy mother’s father; and take thee a wife from thence of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother.” Likewise, if Isaac were living in today’s society, he would be charged with racism and a demand would be made for him to become politically correct and apologize to Esau’s Hittite wives and attend some sensitivity training classes with Rebekah. If Isaac and Rebekah were living today, they would not only be called racists but bigots, extremists, right-wingers and Nazis! Not only that, but today’s satanic, liberal, integrated churches would excommunicate Isaac and Rebekah, along with Yahshua Christ Himself from their fellowship. It is simply repulsive when one turns on the TV to a so-called Christian channel and a denominational preacher says, “Come to our church next Sunday where we welcome diversity, and see what god is doing at our church.” Well, god is doing something at his church all right, but his god isn’t Yahweh the Creator, his god is Satan the integrator!
In a reply letter from William Finck to Dave Barley, (and Barley is supportive for bringing arabs into Israel Identity), Finck wrote as follows: “It was Balaam who counseled Balak (Numbers chapters 22 through 25) to have his Canaanite-Moabite subjects seduce the men of Israel ‘and fell in one day three and twenty thousand’ (1 Cor. 10:8). For more evidence of this see Micah 6:5, and Josephus’ Antiquities 4:6:6 (4:126-130), where this is explained explicitly. Now Mr. Barley, since these Arabs (mixed) people are the products of fornication (race-mixing), who are ‘trees whose fruit is withered’ for whom ‘is reserved the blackness of darkness forever’, how do YOU suppose that they can be ‘saved’? And if they are ‘broken cisterns that can hold no water’, how do YOU suppose that the Spirit of Yahweh could or even would inhabit them? How do you suppose that the Holy Spirit would touch the unclean thing? What is a cloud without water? Dust. And what was Adam before Yahweh added His Spirit? Dust. See Genesis 2:7. A cloud without water is equivalent to a ‘man’ without the Spirit of Yahweh, which bastards are!
“Then Mr. Barley lies: ‘In your open letter ... you also make the false assumption that many people make. Most of us were taught in the Judeo-Christian world that whoever becomes a Christian becomes a spiritual Israelite’...” To see the entire story on this, see William Finck Challenges Dave Barley Concerning Arabs And Universalism (And Other Sins).
While we are on the subject of Balaamism, we can see clearly from Jude 7 & 11 that Cain was indeed a half-breed: “Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication [homosexuality & race-mixing], and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire ... Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.”
The “they” of Jude 11 is not only referring to the Baal-Peor incident, where Balaam advised Balak to have his non-Israel women sexually seduce and fornicate (race-mix) with the Israel men, but also refers to Sodom and Gomorrah, who were “going after strange flesh”, which is also race-mixing. Jude compares or parallels this as being identical to “the way of Cain”. Thus, (1) Sodom and Gomorrha, (2) the advice of Balaam, and (3) the way of Cain all have race-mixing connotations. Thus, Jude makes it clear that Cain was a product of miscegenation, and not the son of Adam. Josephus describes the incident at Baal-Peor more graphically than anyone else, and that is why we desperately need his greatly detailed version of that race-mixing episode.
A paper on this subject of Yahweh, The God Of Segregation, vs. Satan, The god Of Integration would not be complete without a look at Daniel’s prophecy on the racial matter. For that we must look into Nebuchadnezzar’s dream-image. It is generally understood by most that the four world empires predicted by Daniel were the Babylonian, Medo-Persian, Greek and Roman empires. These four empires were once largely peopled by Whites, but the people occupying those same geographic areas today have changed considerably. For our purpose here, we need to focus our attention on the Roman empire which was represented by iron, and especially the toes of iron mixed with clay. The ten toes of the image depicted the ten provinces of Rome, not some future revived Roman empire as most surmise! Rome would then follow the same fate that befell Egypt before Jeremiah’s day when they absorbed non-Adamic blood! That is the precisely reason that Jeremiah warned the Judaeans not to go to Egypt !
Daniel 2:43 is the answer to the mystery of the iron mixed with clay: “And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.” The word for “men” in this case is #606 and means enawsh in Chaldee (same as #582 in Hebrew, enowsh; in other words, non-Adamite.). We see then, within the confines of the provinces of Rome, they had their own version of multiculturalism (race mixing). It didn’t work then, and it is still just as destructive today!
In the earlier periods of Rome, interracial marriages were, as a rule, not legal. In Sheldon’s General History, page 157 (speaking of the incorporation of the Macedonians about 172 to 168 B.C.) it says this: “Laws are given them by the Romans, and they are divided into four districts, between which there is to be no intermarriage, no free trade in land.”
As time went on, and Rome came under hard financial times, she decided to offer citizenship to more peoples in order to gain additional taxpayers. In the book The Romans by R. H. Barrow, it says this on page 52: “... Her near neighbours were incorporated as citizens into her body politic, to others she extended a limited citizenship which conferred rights of trade, together with enforcement of those rights at law, the freedom of intermarriage with Roman citizens ...”
In order to fathom Daniel’s prophecy, it is important to understand Roman history. In order to grasp the toes of Daniel, it is necessary to have some knowledge of the slave traffic during those years. I will now quote some passages concerning slavery during the Roman epoch.
From The Story Of Civilization: Part 3, “Caesar And Christ” by Will Durant, we read the following: Page 22: “... In the sixth century B.C., when Rome began her career of conquest, war captives were sold in rising number to the aristocracy, the business classes, and even to plebeians; and the status of the slave sank.”
Page 112: “Every week slave dealers brought their human prey from Africa, Spain, Gaul, Germany, the Danube, Russia, Asia, and Greece to the ports of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. It was not unusual for 10,000 slaves to be auctioned off at Delos in a single day. In 177 [B.C.], 40,000 Sardinians, in 167 [B.C.], 150,000 Epirotes, were captured by Roman armies and sold as slaves, in the latter case at approximately a dollar a head. In the city the lot of the slave was mitigated by humanizing contacts with his master and by hope of emancipation; but on the large farms no human relation interfered with exploitation ... The wages of the slave on the great estates were as much food and clothing as would enable him to toil from sunrise to sunset every day ...”
Page 81 speaks of the “ethnic changes” brought about by all this: “... Immigration, the absorption of conquered peoples, the influx, emancipation, and enfranchisement of slaves, were already beginning the ethnic changes that by Nero’s time would make Rome the New York of antiquity, half native and half everything.” [Today New York City is more like 10% White and 90% everything else.]
Upon critiquing this paper, the reader should have a better idea of what is going on in this world. We, the United States, like the Roman empire, are by-and-large following Satan, the god of integration. And as Rome weakened and finally fell because of race-mixing and became chaff driven by the wind never to rise again (Dan. 2:35), so too will America and other Israel countries if Yahweh does not intervene. In short, the White race is being flushed down the toilet into the sewer of multiculturalism – a rotting genetic cesspool!
We have been lied to and told that “diversity will elevate our society”, while the truth is, diversity will debase true civilization and bring it down to a third-world status. Ever since the seduction of Eve in the garden of Eden, integration has been Satan’s plan. The object of this paper is to unmask this satanic subterfuge in such a way that anyone can quickly spot it when the media praises multiculturalism via movies, magazines, newspapers, radio, Internet and television. But especially from the pulpits of the churches. Our churches were infiltrated long ago in the 1930’s by “Christian” socialists holding communistic ideologies, such as Harry Ward and Reinhold Niebuhr at Union Theological Seminary (The Red Network by Elizabeth Dilling, p.31). All of this compliments of the bad-fig-jew Karl Marx, promoting the agenda of Satan, the god of integration, and all 10 planks of his communist manifesto are alive and well and working throughout America today